Meeting the challenges of remote monitoring and inspection

The CQC’s plans for future regulation

I recently watched a webinar on the future of CQC regulation. This was related to the current CQC consultation on more flexible and responsive regulation which is due to close on 23 March and its purpose was to provide the opportunity for CQC staff members to response to a range of questions that had been submitted to them in the wake of the consultation.

It has to be said that many of these questions were left unanswered.  However, one message that did seem to emerge was that in future there is likely to be a lot more remote monitoring and inspection of services.  This has already been used quite extensively during the Covid pandemic and will become the norm as things move forward. Although the CQC webinar was very short of specific detail regarding how such remote monitoring and inspection will work in practice, there are indications that this is likely to involve a lot more requests for information via email and, where possible, the CQC being given access to various online portals that providers may be using to store their service information.  This is something the CQC have already flagged up in their document on good practice in the use of digital records.

Furthermore, it appears that the CQC is going to move away from their regular scheduled face-to-face inspections and these will only take place as and when necessary.  Instead, the focus will be on remote, real-time monitoring of services.  However, one caveat to all this is that this assumes that all provider services will have their information stored in digital format; at the moment the CQC estimates that only 30% of adult social care services are fully ‘digitised’. The CQC will also be relying on information collected from other agencies, e.g. local authorities and local Health Watches, as well as information from the service itself.  Furthermore, I suspect there will be a lot more video interviewing, e.g. with managers, staff and possibly even service users and relatives.

Implications for quality assurance

As someone who has a particular interest in the ‘Well-led’ domain, which includes the issues of quality assurance (QA) and governance, the idea that the CQC is likely to move towards more remote inspection and monitoring struck a chord.  Of course, the first challenge is to encourage all those providers who haven’t already done so to move all their paper-based systems onto digital platforms.  But even assuming all the service information is in digital format and is stored on one or more online systems, there is still the question of how it can be best organised and accessed – both by the provider themselves and by third parties such as the CQC and local authorities.

I’m thinking here not only about how easy it is to locate the information and extract it, but also about how each piece of information or data relates to the CQC’s own quality assurance metrics.  In other words, how the information can be used to provide evidence that the service is good, effective, caring, responsive and well-led, which, as you know, are the five key questions that the CQC asks of every service it regulates (which are also referred to as the five domains.  Or, to put it another way, if the CQC were to log into your system tomorrow how would they rate the quality of information they found?